Ga naar de content
Terug naar resultaten
Meetinstrumenten in de zorg en validatie (Wetenschappelijk) artikel

Evaluating Comprehensibility of 157 Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in the Nationwide Dutch Outcome-Based Healthcare Program: More Attention for Comprehensibility of PROMs is Needed

Abstract

Introduction Patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) are increasingly prevalent in healthcare and used for shared decision-making and healthcare quality evaluation. However, the extent to which patients with varying health literacy levels can complete PROMs is often overlooked. This may lead to biased aggregated data and patients being excluded from studies or other PROM collection initiatives. This cross-sectional study evaluates the comprehensibility of 157 well-known and widely used PROM scales using a comprehensibility checklist. Methods Pairs of two independent raters scored 157 PROM scales designed for adults included in the 35 sets of outcome information developed as part of the Dutch Outcome-Based Healthcare Program. The PROM scales were scored on the eight comprehensibility domains of the Pharos Checklist for Questionnaires in Healthcare (PCQH). Interrater agreement of domain ratings was assessed using Intraclass Correlation Coefficients or Cohen’s kappa. Subsequently, final ratings were established through discussion and used to evaluate the domain-specific comprehensibility rating for each PROM scale. Results Comprehensibility of a large number of PROM scales (n = 157), which cover a wide range of diseases and conditions across Dutch medical specialist care, was assessed. While most PROM scales were written at an accessible language level, with minimal use of medical terms, instruction clarity, number of questions, and response options emerged as significant issues, affecting a substantial proportion of PROM scales. Interrater agreement was high for most domains of the PCQH. Conclusion This study highlights the need for greater attention to the comprehensibility of PROMs to ensure their accessibility to all patients, including those with low health literacy. The PCQH can be a valuable tool in PROM development in addition to qualitative methods and in selection processes enabling comparison of comprehensibility between PROMs. However, the PCQH needs further development and validation for these purposes. Enhancing the comprehensibility of PROMs is essential for their effective incorporation in healthcare evaluation and decision-making processes.

Recent toegevoegd

  • Alle artikelen

    Heb je tijd om een paar korte vragen te beantwoorden?

    De antwoorden worden gebruikt om de Kennishub te evalueren. Door de vragenlijst in te vullen geef je toestemming om je antwoorden te gebruiken voor wetenschappelijk onderzoek.

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    Bij wat voor organisatie werk je?

    Wat is je functie?

    Wat is de reden voor je bezoek aan deze Kennishub?

    Met het invullen van je e-mailadres geef je toestemming om dit e-mailadres te verwerken en je te mogen benaderen voor een interview. Lees de privacyverklaring voor meer informatie over het verwerken van gegevens. Voor vragen kun je contact opnemen met Marente Mol (marente.mol@rivm.nl).