Ga naar de content
Terug naar resultaten
Zorggebruik Deelname aan preventieve zorg en screening (Wetenschappelijk) artikel

Non‐invasive prenatal test uptake in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods

Abstract

Objective: Non‐Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) is increasingly being implemented worldwide. In public health programs, equitable access to healthcare is a fundamental principle which also applies to fetal aneuploidy screening. However, the out‐ of‐pocket costs of NIPT may lead to sociodemographic disparities in uptake of screening. This study assessed whether there is a difference in the uptake of NIPT in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods compared to all other neighborhoods in the Netherlands, where NIPT is implemented in a national screening program (TRIDENT‐2 study).

Method: NIPT uptake, postal code and age of 156,562 pregnant women who received pre‐test counselling for prenatal screening in 2018 were retrieved from the national prenatal screening database. Postal codes were used as a proxy to categorize neighborhoods as being either socioeconomically disadvantaged or other. The out‐of‐pocket costs for NIPT were €175.

Results: NIPT uptake in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods was 20.3% whereas uptake in all other neighborhoods was 47.6% (p < 0.001). The difference in NIPT uptake between socioeconomic disadvantaged neighborhoods and other areas was smaller for the youngest maternal age‐group (≤25 years) compared to other age‐groups.

Conclusion: The variation in uptake suggest underlying disparities in NIPT uptake, which undermines the goals of a national fetal aneuploidy screening program of providing reproductive autonomy and equitable access. This has ethical and policy implications for ensuring fair and responsible implementation of fetal aneuploidy screening. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. © 2021 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis Prenatal Diagnosis. 2021;41:1395–1400. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/pd – 1395 Key points What's already known about this topic?  Equitable access and reproductive autonomy are fundamental principles of fetal aneuploidy screening, especially in the context of a public health screening program  Financial barriers limit access to prenatal screening What does this study add?  NIPT uptake in socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods was over two times lower than NIPT uptake in all other neighborhoods, suggesting underlying disparities  The differences in NIPT uptake between neighborhoods were less for women younger than 25 years 1 |

Recent toegevoegd

  • Alle artikelen

    Heb je tijd om een paar korte vragen te beantwoorden?

    De antwoorden worden gebruikt om de Kennishub te evalueren. Door de vragenlijst in te vullen geef je toestemming om je antwoorden te gebruiken voor wetenschappelijk onderzoek.

    This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
    Bij wat voor organisatie werk je?

    Wat is je functie?

    Wat is de reden voor je bezoek aan deze Kennishub?

    Met het invullen van je e-mailadres geef je toestemming om dit e-mailadres te verwerken en je te mogen benaderen voor een interview. Lees de privacyverklaring voor meer informatie over het verwerken van gegevens. Voor vragen kun je contact opnemen met Marente Mol (marente.mol@rivm.nl).